The life coach con: Can you really trust someone to solve your problems?

Posted by on Monday, September 6th, 2010 at 5:56 pm.

It’s a boom industry – with celebrity clients paying up to £5,000 a session. But can you really trust a life coach to solve your problems? Our investigation will make you think twice.

tommy

A friend I know and admire recently booked to see a life coach for help in making some key decisions. Sadly, the session proved less than fruitful. In fact, ‘it was a total waste of time and money’, apparently.

But as life coaches have been rumoured to have been used by the likes of Bill Clinton, Jennifer Aniston, Madonna and Kylie Minogue, I wanted to get to the heart of this growing industry and find out a little more about it.

There are courses in life coaching advertised in the back of magazines. Recently, I saw one that claimed you could ‘qualify’ in six days, at a cost of £1,760.

I use the inverted commas because the odd thing is that despite being a mass-market, multi-million-pound industry, it is entirely unregulated.

There is no supervisory body or universal standard of practice or training, so, in reality, you can’t really be ‘qualified’. Anyone can call themselves a life coach – and they can’t be struck off.

Before I ring the number for my course, I do a Google search on ‘life coach’. More than 98 million results are returned.

Apparently, it all began in the U.S. about 20 years ago, and it has been estimated that there are more than 100,000 coaches now practising in Britain.

The job, it seems, is to assist people in achieving their goals – whether these are to lose weight, make a career decision or select where they go on holiday.

I ring the number advertised. The company – which for legal reasons I’m not naming – claims to use ‘accelerated learning techniques’ to get students qualified quickly.

They claim other courses slow the process down by getting their students to read ‘five books upwards’.

The man I speak to tells me they’ve been used by the National Health Service, the house of Commons and Kensington & Chelsea Borough Council. What, I wonder, are these bodies getting for the taxpayers’ money?

The man tells me that I sound like a ‘people-person’ and I’d make a good coach. It’s a fairly snap judgement on his part – especially when you consider we’ve been talking for only two minutes.

When he offers me a place on the course, I tell him I need to check some dates, but he takes this as indecisiveness.

He tells me to decide quickly because there’s only one space left. Over the next few days, I get pestered by phone calls encouraging me to sign up.

This hard sell is nearly enough to put me off, but when I relent the pressure changes.

They, want the money now – nine weeks before the course begins. I counter-offer a deposit. he sounds unconvinced, but says a third of the price will do. I pay £586 and am committed to paying the rest in three weeks’ time.

I hear nothing until the balance is due, when I receive an email and three calls asking for money. I pay up and hear no more until the course begins. When I learn from one of the tutors that the company was set up by a former timeshare salesman, it all slots into place.

On day one I report to an anonymous-looking office building in Central London, which I imagine has been hired by the day.

The air inside is stale, as if no one has been there for a while. There are 14 of us on the course, eight men and six women – among them a wild-eyed criminal law barrister who wants global fame as an inspirational speaker, a quantity surveyor and a secondary school teacher. Most of my fellow students are in their late 30s and 40s.

Apparently, the course was popular with bankers after the economic crash. It’s not surprising. A life coach can charge anything for their services. At one point in this course, I am told that a coach was paid £5,000 for a 45-minute session with a major businessman who needed to make a quick decision.

For a more typical one-off, individual, hour-long session, life coaches can get around £130.

As the class settles down in front of flip-chart easels and chairs, it feels like we are about to receive a company sales briefing.

One of our four tutors, Anne, a businesslike woman in her early 40s, exuberantly welcomes us. She tells us she knows something about us – that we are all elite, ‘or you wouldn’t be here’.

Anne actually knows very little about us except our names; I didn’t have to disclose educational qualifications or work history. She certainly doesn’t know I’m a journalist.

Another tutor, Kay, says, ‘we are going on a magical journey’ and that ‘we will see changes within ourselves’. Rachel, the third instructor, was a police officer for 30 years. John is a former chef who has worked in a bank.

On day one we learn what a life coach is – someone who helps people help themselves. The tutors define what a coach does, or rather, doesn’t do.

We are not mentors, counsellors or consultants. We don’t direct, advise, analyse, judge or look into the past. All our questions should be open- ended and not leading or suggestive. ‘How would you feel if that happened? What do you think you could do to change that?’ The client should provide all the answers to their problems themselves.

We’re instructed to follow a method of questioning called TGROW, which stands for Topic, Goal, Reality, Options, Way forward. These five areas will form the key weapons in our life-coach arsenal.

There’s a lot of jargon. We will be in a ‘learning cycle’ and discover how to ‘walk our talk’.

I lost count of the amount of times someone was told to ‘park that’ – meaning hold on to a thought for a day or two.

We’re set to work ‘coaching’ almost straight away. We don’t coach real clients, but practise our techniques on each other.

I am paired with fellow coach-to-be ‘Jennifer’, who is not without her own issues. She is obsessed with making a ‘to do’ list and gets stressed by having to complete all of the tasks on it.

‘How would you feel if you didn’t make lists?’ I ask. She says she must make lists.

According to TGROW, we have to agree a course of action to help her achieve her goal. She suggests she could take some items off and ‘transfer them to the second list’.

‘What second list?’ I ask. ‘I have four,’ she says. ‘You didn’t tell me that you had other lists,’ I say, breaking away from the non-judgmental approach.

‘I suppose I could colour-code the lists, then, in order of importance.’I begin to laugh.

She laughs and looks less stressed. The trainer passing by tells me off and says: ‘You must never laugh at people’s problems.’ Instead, you must get your clients to leave with a goal. That way, the client feels like they’ve achieved something.

A demonstration is given to show how an experienced coach handles a session. The coach looks uncomfortable. At one point he thanks his coachee for smiling.

They discuss the coachee’s wish to lose weight. The coach repeatedly asks him what he could do to achieve this. eventually, he agrees to go for a bike ride. Since the suggestion comes from the client and he already owns a bike, it seems that all he’s done is announce his intention of riding it.

Most of the fellow students I talk to are dissatisfied in their jobs. They all have something in common: they want to change their lives and are attracted to the idea of being their own boss, helping others and qualifying for a professional career within a week.

We’re a group of mixed abilities. Some seem to have a talent for asking open-ended questions and identifying a small goal for their client, while others appeared to lack basic empathy.

I had a feeling that no matter how bad I, or anyone else, was at coaching, we would still walk out of the door clutching a certificate after the six days. I was right. One of my fellow students missed a day and still left with his diploma.

There’s an emphasis on the money-making potential of coaching, and much of the course seems to be an exercise in stating the obvious. We have a very long class on how to establish ‘rapport’. Apparently, we ‘only like people who are like ourselves’ – so we are encouraged to ape clients’ body language and speech patterns.

The odd thing about life coaching is that you know little about the background of the person helping you.

When you see a doctor, you can be pretty sure he’s got a medical degree or two. But if you see a life coach, they may have ‘qualified’ in just a few hours and have less ability to assist you than your next door neighbour or the woman from the Post Office.

Tags: ,

This post has been commented 4 times

1

September 7th, 2010 at 11:51 am

Amechi Udo says:

Useful to see another article to add to the many over the past 10 years on coaching in the UK. Interesting article naturally written to highlight many of the negative aspects of this kind of approach to developing someone’s coaching capabilities.

Public awareness of coaching, selection of coaches and training courses is growing. As with any purchase some responsibility lies with the buyer. Also if people feel they have not received what they expected from a course they can ask for their money back – it does not give them the time back but at least does not leave them out of pocket.

Whilst coaching can seem to be a common sense or simple approach to helping people come up with their own solutions (if they are truly committed to making those changes and able to access the resources needed to make this happen), it takes time and experience to put coaches in a position to develop their competence. Many coaches operate within the ethics codes of coaching bodies like the Association for Coaching and the UK International Coach Federation. Whilst there is no one representative body in the UK the various coaching bodies have increasingly worked together to improve the quality of training and accountability of coaches. Although joining such bodies is voluntary for coaches and training organisations it does, in general indicate a willingness to be held accountable.

As far as the adverts about being able to earn large amounts of money in a short amount of time after only two days training, they are targeting a particular kind of person – often looking for a short cut to wealth without doing much work. As is almost always the case in life, if the offer looks to good to true it probably is. Coaching certification is not the same as business building competence and anyone considering training as a coach would do well to review their business building skills too – and even prioritise getting those sorted out first and then get recognised, accredited training.

Amechi Udo – author of the e-book Choosing A Coaching Course That’s Right For You

2

September 7th, 2010 at 1:02 pm

Alan Wilson says:

Like any profession there is good and bad and of course generally the bad attracts the headlines. If you want to see another side of coaching check out the case studies of some parents who have transformed their lives http://www.parentchampion.com/about-us/case-studies.
Thanks
Alan

3

September 8th, 2010 at 7:40 am

Alison says:

Coaching: A technique to help you achieve your goals faster than you would do so by yourself…….:
There will always be folks who want to cut corners and take the fast track AND some of these WILL have enough skills / experience and just want the piece of paper that customers demand. Why? Because the first law of keeping the roof over one’s head (i.e. staying in business) is to ‘give the customer what they want’.
I invite this ‘fast track’ journalism to look further into coaching practice and the ethics that are encouraged amongst ourselves – tarring all with one brush is simply lazy – many coaches practice ethically and are members of other institutions i.e. ‘professionals’ whose standards of practice cross-over.
When making any purchase in this country it is a case of ‘buyer beware’. It is up to you to check out the competition and to decide what it is you want – ethical coaches are many, just do a little bit of research.
As for the fees – it’s amazing how the fee can focus the client into actually putting their chosen action plans into practice. Besides, how does one price up a product that can have the most amazing effect in improving one’s life?
Many practitioners also provide pro bono coaching – some for philanthropic reasons, others because it gives an opportunity to showcase / practice skills.
There is a clear need for Coaching (business, life, relationship) and many coaches self-regulate ethically. Coaching is an investment in yourself (whether you are the coach or being coached). You will know by instinct whether an individual coach is right for you or not. Undertaking careful research will help especially when selecting out training companies.
As for regulation – that will happen in time – the fields of psychology, surgery and medicine were not regulated in the first decades were they?

4

October 19th, 2010 at 7:39 pm

Thomas says:

An interesting article, I work as a mentor and tutor to professional and young people I also practice as a youth engagement worker. Life coaching should not be taken lightly by the coach or the coachee it takes knowledge, experience, extensive listening skills and plenty of passion including honesty to practice what could be a very respectable and rewarding service to both parties involed, but as always there are inevitably going to be fly by nights out to make a quick buck. The most important qualifications you need to teach other people the wisdom of a positive lifestyle is to have a degree in lifes ups and downs and have had met them head on, and positivly dealt with them and ofcourse a willingness to life long learning and respect the journey. there is no other way trust me, but there will always be room for honest genuine coaches to acheive lifes real riches. Good luck

Leave your comment: